performetra

Best affiliate network in India: how to actually choose one

Every list of "best affiliate networks in India" is written by someone on the list. Here is the evaluation method instead — it works on us too.

TL;DR — the short version

Skip the lists
Rankings are marketing; evaluation criteria are transferable
Five questions
Screening before billing, sub-IDs, raw logs, payout dates, category depth
Red flags
Unlimited volume promises, summary-only reporting, vague traffic rules
Network vs program
Network = speed and reach; own program = control and margin — most brands need both

Search “best affiliate network in India” and you get listicles. Look closely at who published each one: a network on the list, an agency reselling one, or a blogger paid by three of them. The genre is marketing wearing a review costume.

This guide gives you the evaluation method instead. It is more work than reading a ranking and it produces an answer you can defend to your CFO. It also works on us — we run a network, and every criterion below is one we accept being graded on.

Start from your category, not their homepage

Network quality is category-specific. A network superb at COD e-commerce may have no real lending supply; a mobile-gaming specialist may never have run an insurance lead. Your first filter is one question: how many live advertisers do you have in my category right now, and can I speak to one?

A network with depth answers in numbers and offers a reference. A network without it changes the subject to its publisher count — which tells you about registrations, not about your vertical.

The five questions that separate operators from resellers

1. When is fraud screened?

Before billing or after complaints — there is no third answer. Screening before billing means the network absorbs bad traffic as rejected rows; screening after means you fund the fraud and then negotiate refunds. Ask for the specific checks: CTIT distributions, device dedupe, datacentre IPs, network-wide lead deduplication.

2. Are sub-publisher IDs mandatory?

Without sub-IDs, your only quality control is switching the whole campaign off. With them, one bad source is cut while the rest scale. Any network that resists sub-ID transparency is protecting its supply from your scrutiny.

3. Can you export the raw log?

Click ID, timestamp, device, geo, sub-ID and status, per conversion, on demand. Summary dashboards cannot be audited; raw logs can be reconciled against your MMP or CRM. This single request eliminates a surprising share of the market.

4. What date do publishers get paid?

Odd question for an advertiser to ask — and the most revealing one. A network that pays publishers late is holding your campaign together with float, and its best publishers are already routing quality elsewhere. Payout reliability upstream is quality downstream.

5. What happens when quality drops?

Listen for mechanics: caps, kill switch, publisher removal, credited clawbacks with a written window. If the answer is “that rarely happens with us,” it happens constantly.

Network vs your own program

An affiliate network rents you supply, speed and operations. Your own affiliate program owns the partner relationships and keeps the margin — but only if someone actually recruits, briefs and polices it weekly. The mature answer for most established brands is both: network buys for immediate volume, a managed program compounding underneath. Brands earlier in the curve should start with the network buy and graduate.

Run the test that settles it

Whatever the pitches say, the market settles it cheaply: a two-week capped test on two networks, same offer, same payout, sub-IDs on, reconciled against your own data. Delivered quality per rupee — contact rate, delivered-order rate, day-7 retention — makes the decision for you. Networks confident in their supply agree to this immediately; the others begin explaining why their case studies should be enough.

If you want Performetra in that test, send the conversion event and geos — you will have a payout quote the same day, and our answers to all five questions above are written into the insertion order.


Written by the Performetra campaign team. If you want this applied to a live campaign rather than read about, tell us what you are running.

Questions this article answers

The one with live publisher supply in your category, screening before billing, sub-publisher transparency and payouts that arrive on the stated date. That is an evaluation, not a name — any list ranking networks by name is written by or for someone on it. The five questions in this guide produce your answer in two calls.

A marketplace plus an operations layer: it connects advertisers with publishers, runs the tracking, screens traffic quality, handles payouts and reconciles the numbers. Advertisers get reach without managing hundreds of partners; publishers get many offers behind one integration and one payment.

A program is one brand’s own partner scheme; a network aggregates many brands’ offers. Programs give control and lower cost per sale at scale; networks give speed and supply on day one. Mature brands usually run a managed program alongside network buys.

The margin between what the advertiser pays per conversion and what the publisher receives, and on managed engagements a disclosed fee. Ask any network you evaluate to state its model — hesitation is your answer.

Five: When is fraud screened — before or after billing? Are sub-publisher IDs mandatory? Can I export the raw click and conversion log? What date do publishers actually get paid? And how many live advertisers do you have in my category? The answers separate operators from resellers.

Unlimited volume promised in the first call, reporting that only comes as summaries, traffic rules that live in a chat thread instead of the insertion order, reluctance to name the rejection window, and case studies with logos but no mechanics.

Not reliably. Size means supply, but your campaign quality depends on the specific publishers activated for you and how ruthlessly the network cuts the bad ones. A smaller network deep in your category routinely beats a giant spread thin across every category.

Advertisers: often yes, with network-wide deduplication so two networks cannot bill the same conversion. Publishers: yes for offer coverage, but volume concentrated with one good manager gets you better payouts than volume scattered thin.

On outcome pricing, your exposure is the test budget — typically 300–500 conversions at your payout. There should be no setup fee for a standard network buy; managed programs carry a disclosed monthly fee. Anything vaguer, walk.

We are the network this site belongs to, so grade us with the same five questions: screening before billing, mandatory sub-IDs, exportable raw logs, NET-15 payouts in writing, and depth in e-commerce, lending, apps and travel across India and the Gulf. Ask us the questions directly — the answers are contractual, not aspirational.

Next step

Turn this into a campaign.

We price outcomes across app growth, lead generation, e-commerce and creator marketing. Send us the event you want to pay for.